I have to admit that I
don’t have a dog in this Vikings stadium fight. I’m only a casual football fan
at best and I’ve never had an emotional attachment to the Vikings. When my
friends and family-members were devastated by four Super Bowl defeats as a kid,
I shrugged. When Favre threw that interception in New Orleans, I laughed. It’s
just not my thing.
And as for the stadium
itself, I tend to be against this sort of hostage-taking situation in general,
with billionaire owners demanding sports palaces from the taxpayers at little
expense to themselves. But as a resident of Baja Minnesota, this story is pretty much moot to me. If Minnesotans feel that building a football stadium that will be used
eight or ten times a year is an appropriate use of their tax money, well, that’s
no skin off my teeth.
It seems, though, that
the stadium is on life support, all but killed by the Tea Party and far right
elements in the GOP in the state House of Representatives. It’s not that the
House members didn’t approve a stadium bill—they did. But it’s not what the Vikings
wanted nor agreed to, and it’s loaded with so many poison pills that it’s
highly unlikely the Vikings and the NFL will go along with it. They killed the
stadium without making it look like they killed the stadium.
This isn’t mean to be
an obituary for the Vikings because there is still hope they can survive. The
Senate could revive the original bill and pass it as written, then hope that
language survives a conference committee and the House leadership persuades
enough of its members to forget about whatever positions they took on Monday and give it a thumb’s up in a second vote. But
anybody who’s paid even a little attention to politics the last two years knows
the Tea Party doesn’t compromise and it doesn’t change its vote. Ron Paul is
more likely to endorse Barack Obama.
There’s also the
chance the Vikings decide that 50-plus years of history and a huge and hugely
passionate fan base in the Upper Midwest aren’t worth abandoning and cancel the
moving vans, choosing instead to work with whatever sausage comes out of the
legislature. But anyone who’s watched stadium/arena politics knows that’s about
as likely as the Tea Party having a change of heart.
Love ‘em or hate ‘em,
you have to admire the Tea Party folks for sticking to their guns and doing
what they promised to do when elected, which was to cut spending, cut taxes,
and get the government out of business they didn’t think it belonged in. And if
they can’t do that, they stop the legislative wheels from turning and
effectively shut government down. And that’s exactly what they did. Governments
don’t belong in the stadium business, they argue, and so they killed the
stadium. Inelegantly, of course. The far
right will never be known for its sophistication and nuance. But they lived up
their campaign promises, and for that you have to give them credit.
More amusing to me,
though, was the anguished tone of Vikings fans wailing and gnashing their teeth
on the Twitters about the House debate. Clearly, these are not people who have
spent much time paying attention to politics. The horse trading, the debate,
the grandstanding, the over the top rhetoric, the death-by-amendment process
must have been like watching a Czech movie without subtitles. This is how it gets done, people. This is how
the legislative sausage is made. Behold democracy, in all its ugly glory.
I wonder how many
Vikings fans who voted for Tea Party candidates in the last election are
surprised by this. They shouldn’t be. They wanted government off their backs,
they wanted their taxes cut, they wanted freedom and liberty. They wanted to
stick it to liberals and moderate weenies and the Big Money that they believe
controls the government. In the stadium debate, they got exactly what they
voted for.
So there’s now a
reasonably high probability the Vikings will decamp for Los Angeles after next
season, following the Lakers west from Minneapolis, although the Lakers weren’t
a big deal because the NBA was kind of a joke in the 1960s and so nobody cared
that they left, except Sid Hartman. This leaves Vikings fans with little
recourse but to keep calling their legislators and hope some political leader
can pull a rabbit from a purple helmet. It will likely be futile. The Tea Party’s
mode of operation is forward, no compromise, never reconsider, never give it a
second thought, because to do so is selling out. It sticks to its guns and its
campaign promises for good or ill, and if you don’t like that, then you’re just
another political enemy.
2 comments:
The Tea Party faction you seem to be referring to sounds a lot like all Democrats in their bid to pass ObamaCare so we could see what is in the bill. The word compromise is over-used these days. I for one expect my representatives to hold firm to their principles and not capitulate. This is representative government and is as it should be, a fight. Especially when we are putting up money that the public has to borrow to put up in the first place. Whether the stadium or Obamacare, it is simply not responsible to buy things you cannot afford, and especially if it is a loser that causes more shortfalls in the future.
Wow! An actual response! Thanks, Dirtman, you're my first ever commenter on a blog post. Does this make me a real blogger now?
Anyway, as to your comment, I tend to agree with your conclusion about costs/benefits of stadia and health care, but I'd quibble with your characterization of the Dems and Tea Party as having similar approaches. The Dems don't have the wrecking ball approach the Tea Party has, the my way or the highway attitude. They're more than willing to compromise, if that's what's needed to get something through. Take health care reform, for instance. They made numerous concessions to win a few Republican votes, but when it became clear they would get none, they voted it through. If the Democrats used the Tea Party approach, today we'd have the single payer Canadian plan that they originally advocated.
Thanks again for the note. I'm going to have it framed, like a business does when it makes its first dollar.
Post a Comment